http://lab.lonerunners.net/paper/website-defacement-detection-techniques Information security pills and drugs Sun, 25 Dec 2011 18:42:31 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 http://lab.lonerunners.net/paper/website-defacement-detection-techniques/comment-page-1#comment-196 Hein Tue, 12 Apr 2011 11:41:53 +0000 http://lab.lonerunners.net/?p=91#comment-196 hi did you make any progress on your own defacement detection tool? could you share this tool to me? I was thinking in about the same way, also with a threshold et cetera. If you like to share your coding effort, I don't have to reinvent the wheel ... thx in advance! hi
did you make any progress on your own defacement detection tool? could you share this tool to me? I was thinking in about the same way, also with a threshold et cetera. If you like to share your coding effort, I don’t have to reinvent the wheel … thx in advance!

]]> http://lab.lonerunners.net/paper/website-defacement-detection-techniques/comment-page-1#comment-148 Ritu Tue, 07 Dec 2010 12:49:04 +0000 http://lab.lonerunners.net/?p=91#comment-148 Signature detection is a good technique to detect a defaced website. But using a collection of signatures and by updating them with time to tme can easily detect defacement. Signature detection is a good technique to detect a defaced website. But using a collection of signatures and by updating them with time to tme can easily detect defacement.

]]> http://lab.lonerunners.net/paper/website-defacement-detection-techniques/comment-page-1#comment-143 Thomas Corthals Mon, 06 Sep 2010 13:23:55 +0000 http://lab.lonerunners.net/?p=91#comment-143 A checksum comparison can be useful on dynamic sites if you compare the checksums of the source files (php, perl ...) instead of the generated pages. That way you can detect if they have been tampered with. A checksum comparison can be useful on dynamic sites if you compare the checksums of the source files (php, perl …) instead of the generated pages. That way you can detect if they have been tampered with.

]]>